A paper titled “To cross or not to cross? Review and meta-analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance decisions at midblock street crossings” authored by Athanasios Theofilatos, Apostolos Ziakopoulos, Oscar Oviedo-Trespaliacios and Andrew Timmis was recently published by the Journal of Transport & Health. The paper explores pedestrian gap acceptance decisions in urban midblock locations. Fixed effects and random-effects meta-analyses are used to investigate the overall effect of critical variables. Results indicate that a unit increase in vehicle speed decreases pedestrians’ odds of crossing by 10%, while a unit increase in temporal gap size increases the odds of crossing by 7.2 times. Each crossing attempt increases the odds of crossing more than 16 times.
Archives
Tag cloud
accident severity
alcohol
buses
campaigns
cell phone
cerebral diseases
children
culture
cyclists
data analysis
distraction
driving simulator
education & training
enforcement
equipment
esafety
fatigue
helmet
impact assessment
international comparisons
junctions
lighting
lorries
measures assessment
mobility and transport
mopeds
motorcyclists
motorways
naturalistic driving
older drivers
pedestrians
road fatalities
road interventions
road safety data
rural roads
safety assessment
safety equipment
seat belt
speed
strategy
traffic
urban safety
weather
work related safety
young drivers