A paper titled “To cross or not to cross? Review and meta-analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance decisions at midblock street crossings” authored by Athanasios Theofilatos, Apostolos Ziakopoulos, Oscar Oviedo-Trespaliacios and Andrew Timmis was recently published by the Journal of Transport & Health. The paper explores pedestrian gap acceptance decisions in urban midblock locations. Fixed effects and random-effects meta-analyses are used to investigate the overall effect of critical variables. Results indicate that a unit increase in vehicle speed decreases pedestrians’ odds of crossing by 10%, while a unit increase in temporal gap size increases the odds of crossing by 7.2 times. Each crossing attempt increases the odds of crossing more than 16 times.
To cross or not to cross? Review and meta-analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance decisions at midblock street crossings, September 2021
Related Posts
-
Unfolding the dynamics of driving behavior: a machine learning analysis from Germany and Belgium, July 2024
July 3rd, 2024 | Comments Off on Unfolding the dynamics of driving behavior: a machine learning analysis from Germany and Belgium, July 2024 -
Safety evaluation via conflict classification during automated shuttle bus service operations, June 2024
July 2nd, 2024 | Comments Off on Safety evaluation via conflict classification during automated shuttle bus service operations, June 2024 -
European Commission – Promoting Safe Mobility: Protective Equipment, June 2024
June 27th, 2024 | Comments Off on European Commission – Promoting Safe Mobility: Protective Equipment, June 2024