A paper titled “To cross or not to cross? Review and meta-analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance decisions at midblock street crossings” authored by Athanasios Theofilatos, Apostolos Ziakopoulos, Oscar Oviedo-Trespaliacios and Andrew Timmis was recently published by the Journal of Transport & Health. The paper explores pedestrian gap acceptance decisions in urban midblock locations. Fixed effects and random-effects meta-analyses are used to investigate the overall effect of critical variables. Results indicate that a unit increase in vehicle speed decreases pedestrians’ odds of crossing by 10%, while a unit increase in temporal gap size increases the odds of crossing by 7.2 times. Each crossing attempt increases the odds of crossing more than 16 times.
To cross or not to cross? Review and meta-analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance decisions at midblock street crossings, September 2021
Related Posts
-
Driving Automation Systems Penetration and Traffic Safety: Implications for Infrastructure Design and Policy, December 2024
November 21st, 2024 | Comments Off on Driving Automation Systems Penetration and Traffic Safety: Implications for Infrastructure Design and Policy, December 2024 -
Explainable macroscopic and microscopic influences of COVID-19 on naturalistic driver aggressiveness derived from telematics through SHAP values of SVM and XGBoost algorithms, February 2025
November 21st, 2024 | Comments Off on Explainable macroscopic and microscopic influences of COVID-19 on naturalistic driver aggressiveness derived from telematics through SHAP values of SVM and XGBoost algorithms, February 2025 -
Peter Sweatman – Approaches to Road Safety: Evolution, Challenges, and Emerging Technologies, January 2025
November 21st, 2024 | Comments Off on Peter Sweatman – Approaches to Road Safety: Evolution, Challenges, and Emerging Technologies, January 2025