A paper titled “To cross or not to cross? Review and meta-analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance decisions at midblock street crossings” authored by Athanasios Theofilatos, Apostolos Ziakopoulos, Oscar Oviedo-Trespaliacios and Andrew Timmis was recently published by the Journal of Transport & Health. The paper explores pedestrian gap acceptance decisions in urban midblock locations. Fixed effects and random-effects meta-analyses are used to investigate the overall effect of critical variables. Results indicate that a unit increase in vehicle speed decreases pedestrians’ odds of crossing by 10%, while a unit increase in temporal gap size increases the odds of crossing by 7.2 times. Each crossing attempt increases the odds of crossing more than 16 times.
To cross or not to cross? Review and meta-analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance decisions at midblock street crossings, September 2021
Related Posts
-
ITF – Measuring New Mobility: Case Studies and Best Practices Report, December 2024
November 21st, 2024 | Comments Off on ITF – Measuring New Mobility: Case Studies and Best Practices Report, December 2024 -
European Council – Adaptation of Cross-Border Driving Disqualifications, December 2024
November 21st, 2024 | Comments Off on European Council – Adaptation of Cross-Border Driving Disqualifications, December 2024 -
Predicting risky driving behavior with classification algorithms: results from a large-scale field-trial and simulator experiment, November 2024
November 21st, 2024 | Comments Off on Predicting risky driving behavior with classification algorithms: results from a large-scale field-trial and simulator experiment, November 2024